THE GLOBAL FUND ASSESSES ITS INVESTMENTS IN COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS AND APPLICANTS’ EXPERIENCE OF THE GRANT APPLICATION PROCESS -
ABSTRACT
The Global Fund has recently published two reports that highlight two areas of significant interest for its stakeholders. The first report describes the results of a Thematic Review of Global Fund Community Health Investments based on in-depth reviews of five countries. The second report presents the findings of a Global Fund survey that assessed applicants’ experience of the 2020–2022 country dialogue and the funding request development processes.
‘REALITIES ON THE GROUND’ FOR ASIA-PACIFIC CIVIL SOCIETY’S ENGAGEMENT IN GLOBAL FUND ‘COUNTRY DIALOGUE’ ARE IMPROVING
ABSTRACT
The Asia Pacific Council of AIDS Service Organizations has published a report based on a survey across seven countries in the region, examining the degree and nature of civil society and community engagement in the Global Fund’s country dialogue processes. The report notes overall improvement compared to 2015, but highlights the persistence of some of the same issues, and makes recommendations to address them.
GLOBAL FUND SEEKS FEEDBACK FROM PARTICIPANTS IN COUNTRY DIALOGUES AND THE PREPARATION OF FUNDING REQUESTS
ABSTRACT
The Global Fund is asking people who were involved in country dialogues and developing funding requests in the first window of applications for the 2017-2019 funding cycle to provide feedback by completing a survey.
GLOBAL FUND RELEASES CASE STUDIES ON COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
ABSTRACT
A report released by the Global Fund, entitled How We Engage: Stories of Effective Community Engagement on AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, contains eight case studies. This article provides information on five of the case studies – i.e. the studies that were country-specific.
COMMUNITY, RIGHTS AND GENDER ISSUES HAVE A HIGHER PROFILE, BUT CHALLENGES REMAIN IN DEMONSTRATING IMPACT
ABSTRACT
Although The Global Fund has succeeded in raising awareness of community, rights and gender issues, and in getting these issue included in country dialogues and concept notes, there are still challenges in translating these achievements into impact in programs on the ground. This information was included in a report provided to the Board at its meeting in Abidjan on 26-27 April.
SURVEY FINDS AFRICAN KEY POPULATIONS STILL LARGELY EXCLUDED FROM DECISION-MAKING, DESPITE NFM PROMISES
ABSTRACT
Participation by key populations in the applications process is weak, according to a survey conducted by African Men for Sexual Health and Rights, and it is diminishing as countries advance through the different stages.
WHILE TURNING THE PAGE ON A FINANCIAL SCANDAL, MALAWI STILL CONFRONTING CHALLENGES IN PRIORITIZING HIV INTERVENTIONS
ABSTRACT
Malawi is looking to put a financial scandal at the National AIDS Commission behind it and move into the next phase of its HIV response. But the country faces other challenges, amid complaints from civil society that they are under-represented in activities foreseen in a new grant proposal to the Global Fund for $574 million.
GLOBAL FUND OFFERS LOOK BACK ON 2014 IN FINAL NFM PROGRESS UPDATE
ABSTRACT
In its first update on the new funding model for 2015, and ultimately the last stand-alone update it will provide, the Global Fund offered a look back at the roll-out of the mechanism aiming to direct the greatest resources to those countries with the highest disease burden and least ability to pay.
APCOM PREPARES BRIEFING DOCUMENTS FOR KEY POPULATIONS IN ASIA PACIFIC
ABSTRACT
A new series of briefing documents prepared by the Asia Pacific Coalition on Male Sexual Health has been shared with 17 countries that are eligible for Global Fund support for HIV programming. The documents aim to provide key populations with the information they need to get involved at all stages of the new funding model process.
HARD CHOICES IN RUSSIA AS THE FINAL HIV GRANT PROPOSAL IS SUBMITTED
ABSTRACT
Hard choices accompanied the submission of Russia's first HIV concept note under the NGO rule: should the priority be service delivery (including harm reduction and prevention services) or advocacy to change restrictive policies on harm reduction? Country dialogue exposed the fault lines between the two camps as the clock winds down on Russia's time as a Global Fund recipient.
By Tinatin Zardiashvili and Lauren Gelfand